Hi Ramasamy,
Try:
SELECT Top 1 price
FROM POR1 T0
JOIN OPOR T1 ON T1.DocENtry=T0.DocEntry
WHERE T1.CardCode =$[$4.0.0] AND T0.ItemCode =$[$38.1.0]
ORDER BY T1.DocEntry Desc
Thanks,
Gordon
Hi Ramasamy,
Try:
SELECT Top 1 price
FROM POR1 T0
JOIN OPOR T1 ON T1.DocENtry=T0.DocEntry
WHERE T1.CardCode =$[$4.0.0] AND T0.ItemCode =$[$38.1.0]
ORDER BY T1.DocEntry Desc
Thanks,
Gordon
Hi Rakesh,
Same question from my side. Were you able to resolve this?
Hi John,
Are you able to provide more information about the error?
Does it crash as soon as you open or when you're doing a specific task?
Cheers,
Stephen
Hi
now same i can do by maintaining VM MRP type also
then how it differs
and as stated above is my understanding on ND is correct
It worked! Thank you very much!!
I run TBB1 in test for the whole period (future date) of the Facility and worked.
If you see it in TPM13 it should post as it does for Instrument Rates.
Kind Regards
any one know anythings about this error?
if yes can you help me please?
Hi Slavomir,
Does outbound email work fine? That's usually a good test to verify if the issue with inbound emails is due to infrastructure or configuration.
Thanks,
Gab
As per documentation, the following should work:
To mix REL and non-REL substitution parameters, proceed as follows:
='Job ${jobId} has a parameter Param1 with the following value: '+parameters.Param1
thanks
Nanda
Yep,
We have installed CPS 8.0 M33.104 on Multiple node setup + HA, we do not have any problem in retrieving job logs or spool.
thanks
Nanda
hi Brian,
I am taking this suggestion from another thread by h. Carpenter.
the runstart column is epoch time(bigint) in Job table.
Say, you want the job that has not run after May 1, 2015 - convert that to epoch (milliseconds)
For each job definition in jobdefinition table
check if there exists an entry greater than above epoch value in Job table
Yes-->do nothing
else --> print the job definition
the result will be you required list.
As this may be an expensive statement on your DB, you can narrow down the selection on job definition table by name pattern or applications or partitions.
thanks
Nanda
Check the keep clause on the job chains.
thanks
Nanda
Hi Mr Grigoriy,
Thanks. It works fine now.
I'm new to SCN. Can you teach me how to award you points?
Thanks
Azima
Moreover, I always ensure that if I reject any post, either I message the OP directly or add a comments as to why that post has been rejected.
I witness this for G Lakshmipathi.
Thank$
Hi Souvik, thank you for your reply. We already did this but the content-type still application/json in the response.
Any other idea?
Tks. Rgds, Raphael
Hello Feroz,
I have tested the query and it works and it returns expected data for me. I would suggest to execute the same query in other working environments and validate it.
Answering to your next question, BO CMS database is encrypted, therefore Query Builder is the only option to pull desired data. CI_SYSTEMOBJECTS is a virtual table, so you would not find it at DB side. For more information on Query Builder, please refer Manikandan's blog:
BusinessObjects Query builder - Basics
Good luck!
- Mahesh
Dear Fatima,
Agreed with Dev, You may check the feasibility of development only via BADI "BADI_MATERIAL_REF".
Best Regads
Mohsin Abbasi
Olá, Eduardo!
Obrigado pelo feedback! Infelizmente não posso configurar o cenário, pois pertenço à área de negócio, ou seja, não pertenço à equipe de desenvolvimento/implementação. Certamente eu escreveria um KBA se fosse possível.
Conheço o fluxo de STO normal, por isso estou solicitando a implementação do retorno, porém preciso reunir argumentos para priorização desta implementação. Com uma apresentação oficial do fluxo seria mais fácil, pois imagino que poderia demonstrar para as áreas de negócio como funcionaria o retorno do estoque em trânsito na prática, tanto as movimentações contábeis quanto o atendimento às obrigações acessórias.
Novamente agradeço por seu feedback!
Atenciosamente,
Pedro Oliveira
This is completely against the standard process. Once you know the overtime in time eval, creating it in IT2005 would be step back. You only use 2005 (and since ca year 2004 IT2002 instead), if you don't have clocktimes for the overtime.
If you have clocktimes overtime wagetypes are created based on T510s and schema. Then they go directly into payroll - or banktime.
Or your process requires approval. Then IT2007 is captured manually(!) as approval for the overtime to go through.
Strongly recommend to check basic PT process in training, or you are at risk of messing up a schema by learning detailed technical wizardrx, bot not understanding the fundamental principals.
Hi Cris
Yes, Command line process got closed since I wasnt getting any response after 30 mins, so I assume upgrade was stopped while was running since it was writing could not connect to database so I assume the Post Processings scripts were left in the limbo.
So that why I tried to re-run the upgrade as detailed on the note, but as you mentioned, preupgrade checks thinks the ASE Server was already upgrade when it wasnt.
So if we can somehow modify the dat file to skip preupgrade check and re-run it all again would be great!
Best
Martin